This a vid of a british army holdin off 2 roman familys. 2 breaches in the wall fierce hand to hnad and siege towers, thousnads of Cavalry stampided throught breaches and slammin in to choen swordsmen while heads rain from above who will have hold of the city when the sun rises?
This is a long video the last few minutes are boring for i had to look for a ll the units that are fighting to the death so the battle cud end
So bowt all da spllin mistakes but plz leave a comment of ani kind plz
Posted on 04/02/05 @ 02:13 AM
Bad spelling is a complete and total understatement.
Posted on 04/03/05 @ 10:15 AM
You are hereby arrested in the name of the speling and grammer poleese.
Posted on 05/18/05 @ 05:43 AM
I am giving this a 1 because it illustrates the IDIOCY of the attackers. Who in God's name brings nearly 10 units of praetorian cav to a SIEGE BATTLE. They were all wiped out! The Romans are lucky to have won! I challenge anyone to prove to me why you should EVER bring more than 3 units of cav to a seige. Hello?? Can you say Onagers??? An army of 5000 men brings 2 onagers: TWO. Oh yeah, and let's run around the inside of the city without capturing the towers so they can give us those nice arrows in our backs we all know and love. You should have defeated the British much more easily.
Posted on 10/24/06 @ 06:56 PM
I completely agree with deadfrog.
I never have cavalry when I lay siege to a settlement.
Mere infantry is the best option here.
I always capture all of the towers, because my enemy can be hit by it, too?
And maybe a third question: why did you pick the Britons? If it's just for fun, it's ok.