You must be logged in to post messages.
Please login or register

Rome Strategy Discussion
Moderated by Terikel Grayhair, General Sajaru, Awesome Eagle

Hop to:    
loginhomeregisterhelprules
Bottom
Topic Subject: The Seleucids...what's your strategy with them?
« Previous Page  1 2  Next Page »
posted 05 February 2005 20:01 EDT (US)   
Due to the Seleucids WIDE range of units that leaves a significant margin of strategy. What I do is use 4-7 silver shield legionairres with 2 silver shield pikes each on the flanks(for a total of four pike cohorts). THEN I use 3 cataphracts, 3 companions, 2 armoured elephants, and 2 scythed chariots. This leaves a STRONG army with stable infantry and an even mightier cavalry. Only archers are lacking.

Crusade! Our brothers in the East need out swords to subdue the Infidel! The Saracen defiles the Sepulchre and is at the gates of the Roman emperor!. Ride! Ride ye holy soldiers to Jerusalem! Byzantium calls for aid...Christ and the Virgin weep at the blood of martyrs spilled on holy pilgrimages! Crusade! -Medieval 2: Total War
Replies:
posted 05 February 2005 20:38 EDT (US)     1 / 30  
Phalanx Pikemen supported by Cataphracts/Greek Calvary, with 2-3 units of Scythed Chariots to slaughter hostile chariots and calvary. A couple archers/militia calvary for skirmishing couldn't hurt.

Online I usually substitute Silver Shields for the Phalanx Pikemen, as in multiplayer I don't have to climb up the tech tree. Throw in some Armoured Elephants/Legionnaires for flanking attacks.

posted 05 February 2005 21:24 EDT (US)     2 / 30  
yeah online if silver shield pikes cost too much phalanx pikemen wouldn't be too much of a downgrade...

Crusade! Our brothers in the East need out swords to subdue the Infidel! The Saracen defiles the Sepulchre and is at the gates of the Roman emperor!. Ride! Ride ye holy soldiers to Jerusalem! Byzantium calls for aid...Christ and the Virgin weep at the blood of martyrs spilled on holy pilgrimages! Crusade! -Medieval 2: Total War
posted 06 February 2005 05:53 EDT (US)     3 / 30  
Yeah, the Seleucids are one of the most powerful factions in the game. Because of that, and because they are Greek i always play them. But i really lack any creative tactics with them, and so far nobody on this site really helped me out(no offence.)So, does someone cares to share his wisdom with me?
posted 06 February 2005 06:23 EDT (US)     4 / 30  
the seleucids are unoriginal, they just copy everyone elses units. I don't use them. Why, because if you want an elephant civ i use carthage, a phalanx civ i use greece and leigionarys i use rome. A mix doesn't just bring the advantages but also the disadvantages.

English & Proud
posted 06 February 2005 08:21 EDT (US)     5 / 30  
They're too powerful, I'd rather use the other civs like Thrace, Greece, Macedon, Parthia, Armenia, and Carthage, they have more limitations and variations.
posted 06 February 2005 09:50 EDT (US)     6 / 30  
True Seleucids are a copy nation, but for power they bring the Legionairres from the West, Cataphracts from the east, elephants and chariots from the south, and of their own phalanxes and companion cavalry. Tell me again that's a bad civ. I don't see what's wrong with taking the best of a few civs and flavoring them. i find them a highly effective online civ as they are versatile.

Crusade! Our brothers in the East need out swords to subdue the Infidel! The Saracen defiles the Sepulchre and is at the gates of the Roman emperor!. Ride! Ride ye holy soldiers to Jerusalem! Byzantium calls for aid...Christ and the Virgin weep at the blood of martyrs spilled on holy pilgrimages! Crusade! -Medieval 2: Total War
posted 06 February 2005 11:16 EDT (US)     7 / 30  
They've got eberything, and that's no fun to me. there is no challenge without limitations.
posted 06 February 2005 13:19 EDT (US)     8 / 30  
Of course Seleucids lack archers.

Crusade! Our brothers in the East need out swords to subdue the Infidel! The Saracen defiles the Sepulchre and is at the gates of the Roman emperor!. Ride! Ride ye holy soldiers to Jerusalem! Byzantium calls for aid...Christ and the Virgin weep at the blood of martyrs spilled on holy pilgrimages! Crusade! -Medieval 2: Total War
posted 06 February 2005 14:34 EDT (US)     9 / 30  
because seleucid are good at everything it means they're not great at enything, hence my issue. If you use there phalanxs greece will beet them if you use there leigons rome will beet them and elephants or cataphracts carthage will beet them. Hence, seleucid = a poo faction

English & Proud
posted 06 February 2005 16:00 EDT (US)     10 / 30  
Aparantly you've never player online. Oh and Seleucids spears are longer than royal pikes and spartan hoplites, therefore they will be skewered on seleucid pikes. S.S.Legionairres can be beaten by their roman counterpart.
Elephants are the same for Carthage and Seleucia(except seleucid elephants cost more).

Crusade! Our brothers in the East need out swords to subdue the Infidel! The Saracen defiles the Sepulchre and is at the gates of the Roman emperor!. Ride! Ride ye holy soldiers to Jerusalem! Byzantium calls for aid...Christ and the Virgin weep at the blood of martyrs spilled on holy pilgrimages! Crusade! -Medieval 2: Total War
posted 06 February 2005 16:57 EDT (US)     11 / 30  
Well, Silver Legions are equal to Legionary Cohorts. Praetorians and Urbans of course, beat them.

I put a dollar in one of those change machines. Nothing changed. ~George Carlin
posted 06 February 2005 17:08 EDT (US)     12 / 30  
Tested:

Spartans vs. Silver Shield Pikemen - Spartans won with 61 men alive, the Silver Shields routed with 20 men left.

Armoured Hoplites vs. Shilver Shield Pikemen - Armoured Hoplites won with 40 men alive, the Silver Shields routed with 13 men left.

Don't underestimate the Greek Supremacy in phalanxes.

posted 06 February 2005 17:19 EDT (US)     13 / 30  
I use to love the Seliucids but their archers really are poor.

I played a guy online (i was egyptians, pre-patch) and bought about 5 Pharoahs Bowmen. I concentrated fire at his archers, and killed them. He sent forward scythed chariots and cataphracts, but the Chariots ran amok, killing most of the cataphracts and his elephant general.

Then it was simply up to my archers to pick away at his phlanxes and legionarries.


house won this
posted 06 February 2005 20:26 EDT (US)     14 / 30  
Either you were slanting in the test OR the seleucid was being a complte idiot.

Crusade! Our brothers in the East need out swords to subdue the Infidel! The Saracen defiles the Sepulchre and is at the gates of the Roman emperor!. Ride! Ride ye holy soldiers to Jerusalem! Byzantium calls for aid...Christ and the Virgin weep at the blood of martyrs spilled on holy pilgrimages! Crusade! -Medieval 2: Total War
posted 06 February 2005 20:33 EDT (US)     15 / 30  
Yea, I mean, I just recently played a game against a guy with an all Spartan rmy online. I was the Seleucids. My phalanxes alone managed to rout some of his center while my Legionaries held one flank and my cavalry whittled down his formation on the other flank. Only 2 out of four routed, and I won. Neither were upgraded at all.

I put a dollar in one of those change machines. Nothing changed. ~George Carlin
posted 06 February 2005 21:19 EDT (US)     16 / 30  

Quote:

because seleucid are good at everything it means they're not great at enything, hence my issue. If you use there phalanxs greece will beet them if you use there leigons rome will beet them and elephants or cataphracts carthage will beet them. Hence, seleucid = a poo faction


They are awesome at EVERYTHING. They have two of the best heavy cavalry. They have elephants. They have one of the best phalanx units in the game. They have an infantry that is nearly as good as the legionary cohort but is slightly cheaper.
posted 06 February 2005 22:36 EDT (US)     17 / 30  
Elrond: Every time I say I test something, that means I strive for a fair match between 2 sides.

Map: Sahara Desert. Match one was Spartan Hoplites vs. Silver Shield Pikemen on medium difficulty, a simple unit vs. unit test. It was a head-on confrontation, both phalanxes engaged in a frontal fight, and those were the results in my previous post. The test was, of course, in singleplayer. Note that when only one phalanx advances and the other stays put, the defensive side has the advantage of not allowing the other person through the line of spear points. In this case, the Silver Shields would gain the upper hand, but not in my test, in which 2 phalanxes attacked eachother.

Perhaps it was you that were doing quite well in the multiplayer match that you had other factors affect the outcome of the match-up. I need not tell you that this is true, for you can always check it yourself as you please.

[This message has been edited by Xorhas EL Malek (edited 02-06-2005 @ 10:40 PM).]

posted 07 February 2005 16:31 EDT (US)     18 / 30  
Were you the spartans or seleucids? If you were spartans i would say "shame on you" if you didn't win.

Crusade! Our brothers in the East need out swords to subdue the Infidel! The Saracen defiles the Sepulchre and is at the gates of the Roman emperor!. Ride! Ride ye holy soldiers to Jerusalem! Byzantium calls for aid...Christ and the Virgin weep at the blood of martyrs spilled on holy pilgrimages! Crusade! -Medieval 2: Total War
posted 07 February 2005 16:34 EDT (US)     19 / 30  
I was both the Spartan Hoplites and the Seleucid Silver Shields in two consecutive tests. The same goes for the Armoured Hoplites tests. The Greek Cities are the true masters of the phalanx, it seems.

What was your point by saying that if I were the Spartans, and if I lost, I should be ashamed? Weren't you arguing the other way a few posts earlier? Confusing

[This message has been edited by Xorhas EL Malek (edited 02-07-2005 @ 04:35 PM).]

posted 07 February 2005 17:34 EDT (US)     20 / 30  
You're probably right Xorhas. My onagers gave them some major abuse while they ran to attack me. Still though, I was fighting 5 almost full units of Spartans and I managed to rout a couple only with Silver Shields...

I put a dollar in one of those change machines. Nothing changed. ~George Carlin
posted 07 February 2005 23:02 EDT (US)     21 / 30  
Spartans have two HP. And they can slaughter silver shields pikes if they don';t ven go into a Phalanx Battle and flank. Charging with Spartans is actually pretty good. I wouldn't be stupid enough to impale my guys into a Pike Phalanx.

You would need to go range against the Seleucids. Many inexperienced Seleucid Players would be beaten by Spartans/Cretans/Onagers. Or Pharoah's Bowmen with Desert Cav and Desert Axeman, since the Desert Cav's AP axe will take away a lot of Cataphacts's Armor. or Unique Strategy from Numidians, Pontus, Armenians would beat them by surprise too.


posted 08 February 2005 01:11 EDT (US)     22 / 30  
"Spartans have two HP. And they can slaughter silver shields pikes if they don';t ven go into a Phalanx Battle and flank. Charging with Spartans is actually pretty good. I wouldn't be stupid enough to impale my guys into a Pike Phalanx."

I'm fairly certain Spartan's have the most powerful charge in the game. As a note, it's better than Cataphracts at least. No mount bonus though so the numbers are deceptive though, still, it is a powerful charge.

For Selucids I would say they're not the best race, nor are they bad. They have the core units of many races, this is true, what they lack is specialist units, 'elite elite' infantry, and mid-range cavalry. And of course archers. They have across-the-board talents but they don't reach the same heights as focused civs.

They have amazing infantry but nothing to compete with the likes of Bezerks, Chosen Axemen, Elite Cohorts and Spartan Hoplites. They lack specialist units such as Night Raiders, War Dogs, Gladiators, etc.

Their cavalry are good but setting aside Greek Cavalry and Militia Cavalry (both rubbish) they have two choices: Heavy or Superheavy. No light, fast horse archers or AP swarmers like Head Hunters or Desert Cav, no specialist cav like Camel Lancers or Cataphract Camels. No solid mid-range cav like Long Sheilds or Macedonian Cavalry.

On the campaign map they suffer further as they can't get any good temple upgrades. Hephastus is nice, but nothing like the Macedonians (Artemis and Ares) or the Greeks (Nike) etc. Which only serves to increase the 'good at everything but awesome at nothing,' gap.

posted 08 February 2005 01:29 EDT (US)     23 / 30  

Quote:

As a note, it's better than Cataphracts at least.


Wha.. what? The cataphract has 15 charge bonus, while the Spartans have 4, since the Spartans don't charge with spears.

The Companion has a charge bonus of 16 with spears.

[This message has been edited by Firefox (edited 02-08-2005 @ 01:30 AM).]

posted 08 February 2005 01:52 EDT (US)     24 / 30  

Yes the Cataphract bonus is better, but -

16, 4 charge.

7, 15.

Only by 2 points. And for all that their basic attack is almost half that of Spartan's (better with maces, true, though still lower) Just as a note as well Cataphracts have 8 morale, Spartan's have 14

Not entirely sure how the Phalanx spear charge bonus works. I think perhaps it counts if they are charged, that would seem correct but it's hard to test.

posted 08 February 2005 10:10 EDT (US)     25 / 30  
Seleucids are awesome. Debatable whether they are the best but when you have elephants, cataphracts, legionarres, a good phalanx... you gotta be at least decent.

"Your wisdom is surpassed only by your ignorance"
« Previous Page  1 2  Next Page »
Total War Heaven » Forums » Rome Strategy Discussion » The Seleucids...what's your strategy with them?
Top
You must be logged in to post messages.
Please login or register
Hop to:    
Total War Heaven | HeavenGames